Log in Page Discussion History Go to the site toolbox

COMM 341: Relevance

From BluWiki

UVA Notes > COMM 341 > COMM 341: Relevance

Plaintiff controls materiality, and materiality controls evidence

Contents

Why it's important

  • If evidence is revelant > it comes in > it could affect the result
  • If evidence is not > it stays out> it does NOT affect the result

Defination

1. Logical relevance

  • Evidence offered at trial is logically relevant if & only if it tends to prove or disprove something which is material.
    • Material refers to the cause of action, relevance refers to evidence
    • Evidence is not relevent because insanity is not MATERIAL (not in cause of action).
  • See relevance sheet - get a copy from Semira

Useful term: Dispositive

  • Evidence is dispositive if, standing by itself, it proves or disproves one of the relevance numbers (without the need of ANY other evidence). It "disposes of" that number. AKA - "smoking gun".
  • Dispositive is a small, rare subset of relevance - most evidence is NOT dispositive

2. Legal relevance

  • For evidence to come in, it must be both logically and legally relevant
  • Evidence offered at trial is legally relevant if & only if its tendency to prove or disprove something which is material outweighs its tendency to cause prejudice.
    • Hitman evidence - nickname implies guilt

Site Toolbox:

GNU Free Documentation License 1.2
This page was last modified on 4 October 2005, at 19:46.
Disclaimers - About BluWiki