Talk:February 2, 2006

From BluWiki

I am very happy that you mentioned those names. It seems that Chabad Lubivitch founder was racist? This actually does shock me to some extent, since the Schneerson group, at least the one run by Moshe Yess, seems so tolorant (they used to give out dollar bills to passers-by for some period in New York).

It is true that these individuals seem to constitute some kind of fringe within the Jewish community. However, as is probably meant when these people complain about Judaism in general, there seems to be a systemic problem here that resembles that of Roman Catholicism and Hinduism (two religions that I have learnt to dispise rather passionately, and the latter is implicitely racist for sure and had a very heavy, though conveluted, influence upon Nazism), in which religious leaders are given sole authority to interprite scriptures as they see fit, not to mention such an ambiguous and difficult body of work as Talmud being put into prominance. It is in conditions like this, combining clerical ambiguity and rigid control of laymen, that dangerous factional cults can certainly thrive and Zionism appears to be amongst the by-product of these earlier, pre-enlightenment mentality.

Please read Manfred Davidmann's site (Solbaram.org). Though he sounds like a Zionist, he is brutally honest about the relationship between Rabbinical Judaism and the Torah. IdeArchos -- 01:21pm