Talk:January 18, 2006
From BluWiki
(2) Daryl Bradford Smith says that Zionism has never had majority support in the Jewish community. Is he kidding? There's a flag of Israel in every synagogue I've set foot in. Have you ever set forth on a temple before the Holocause? The reason you see Zionist Jews everywhere is because the Nazis prooved Zionism's thesis, that the relationship between Jew and Goy are inherant, possibly biological, and irreconcilable (you can see why Zionism seems to like the Nazis so much, they would be out of business if there were no super-ordinate threat to keep the Jewish community and well meaning Goyim in line and unified).
(4) Daryl Bradford Smith talks about people that "are trying to establish the state of Israel." Is he not aware that the state was established in 1948? He probably means establish it geopolitically, as in Eretz Yeshrael (he probably should have said "fortify" instead).
(5) Yet again, Daryl Bradford Smith believes that Zionism is tied to Jewish conspiracies going as far back as the Spanish Inquisition if not further. And this is were I think Daryl has to catch up on. Israel and Zionism, in of itself, is simply another manifestation of religion or nationalist fanaticism, just with particularly bright people within it's ranks. The really big conspiracy, if it can be called such, concerns the Rothschild and related banking families and their alliences with European (especially Anglo) aristocratic establishment. Hufschmid reveals this himself, that Zionism is simply a social hysteria whith which the Rothschilds and their Europea/Anglo friends decided to take advantage of (if not manufacture outright). I think Daryl ought to begin classifying these two and seeing them for what they really are (Eric has, and interestingly, what he says is that Israel's insanity may well end up destroying the world, and with it, any investment the Rothschilds and thier friends may have made, which is why the Rothschilds are probably supporting Iran and what seems to be this upcomming "Eurasian Allience" between France, Germany, Russia, and China, I do not think America, or any of Israel's other English-speaking puppets are going to survive this conflict to prevent all-out destruction).
(6) Daryl Bradford Smith says that every Jew is supposed to have ten "Esau slaves" according to "the Torah's I've read." I wasn't aware that there was more than one Torah. That's because there is not. Why do you keep making cheap pot shots at the guy? Yes, he is uneducated and knows close-to-nothing about Judaism. Tell me another "ordinary" American who does....
(7) Ted Pike says that the Pharisees were the predominant sect of Jews when Jesus was alive. This is patently false. In fact, the Sadduccees, who rejected Oral Torah, were the ruling party in the Sanhedrin, and there were more sects of Jews in Judea in the first century AD than in any other time. But, the Pharisees were very powerful (I remember Douglas Reed in his Controvercy of Zion claim that the Pharisees provoked the Roman invasion so as to destroy this and other Religio-Political opponents).
(10) Ted Pike says the Pharisees had Jesus crucified. Actually it was the Sadduccees who handed Jesus over to the Romans for crucifixion. The Pharisees would have carried out a death penalty themselves if they had wanted to, and it wouldn't have been crucifixion. Remember that the fundamental creed of Christianity, the Nicene Creed, says nothing about Jews killing Jesus; it says, "He was crucified by Pontius Pilate."
